What is more just: rationing health care based upon bureaucratic decisions or ability to pay?
Both socialzed and free market health care ration health care.
In socialized health care, care is rationed based upon bureaucratic decisions.
In free market health care, care is rationed based upon the ability of the person to pay.
Which is more just?
Which is more just for a child?
Related posts:
- You think the Health care plan is good?
- Health Insurance Decisions In An Economic Recession
- Does McCain-Feingold restrict average citizen’s ability to pool money and buy ad space to affect gov’t policy?
- Florida Health Insurance Provides Complete Health Care Solution
- Medical Insurance for Ensuring Better Care of your Health
June 22nd, 2010 at 7:15 pm
Ability to pay especially since if push comes to shove and you get rushed to the ER you will get taken care of but the bureaucrat won’t give a darn about it- you’re just a number
June 23rd, 2010 at 5:46 am
For most satisfactory without too much undue financial burden.
The losing individuals thus just is minimal the number of individuals to the cracks however given the free market given the community as minimizing the socialized please use in socialized.